Book Review: Go Set a Watchman by Harper Lee (4/5)

29 Dec

After all of the press around this book, I was reluctant to read it. I was in no rush, but I did put it on my TBR. It was out of curiosity, really. I read ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ while I was in 9th grade and it was enjoyable but wasn’t my favorite book from school or one I’ve re-read for any reason. It had a good story and made for a good study, that was all. After hearing the controversy (catch up with the NY Times if needed), I was curious and angry, not excited. But armed with an audiobook and holiday baking to do, I dove in and was pleasantly surprised.

Cover image via Goodreads

Cover image via Goodreads

Go Set a Watchman by Harper Lee

Summary from Goodreads:

Maycomb, Alabama. Twenty-six-year-old Jean Louise Finch–“Scout”–returns home from New York City to visit her aging father, Atticus. Set against the backdrop of the civil rights tensions and political turmoil that were transforming the South, Jean Louise’s homecoming turns bittersweet when she learns disturbing truths about her close-knit family, the town and the people dearest to her. Memories from her childhood flood back, and her values and assumptions are thrown into doubt. Featuring many of the iconic characters from To Kill a Mockingbird, Go Set a Watchman perfectly captures a young woman, and a world, in a painful yet necessary transition out of the illusions of the past–a journey that can be guided only by one’s conscience.

I went in expecting nothing. Honestly, that might be why I liked it as much as I did. It sounds terrible, but going in with really low expectations helped me like this book. I thought it would be a much rougher first draft and I fond the book to be reasonably well polished. It makes sense that she probably edited it a bit before taking a debut novel to an editor. I guess the press made me expect the worst. I thought the flashbacks were a little often and a little long which I feel a good editor would have pared down. A lot of them didn’t relate to the story being told, either. I’m thinking of the story of the kids playing ‘Revival’ and being caught by the priest. It illustrated a character that didn’t play a role in the main action so why was it there? To make the book longer and sell it for more. I also thought the book lacked a solid plot. The story was Scout’s journey to accept the town she grew up in but the process was confusing to me and a lot of things that happened weren’t relevant to that journey. It needed some serious editing.

I’m not sure how credible I think the characters are. Alabama during segregation is very different from where I live or have ever visited. I can’t imagine the tensions going on in the town. To me, Jean Louise seemed like the sanest person in a world of quiet bigots. They don’t want anything to change and refuse to come around to the northern way of thinking. They’re stubborn as mules and in the end, Jean Louise accepts what they say. She doesn’t agree, but she accepts it and that was hard to read as a fan of To Kill a Mockingbird. That Atticus is even listening to a pro-segregation speech is hard to listen to. We have to consider that these characters are different from the ones we grew up loving. Editing changed Atticus so he’s no longer the same person.

Scout was a great character. As a northerner in 2015, I related to her mentality more than the other characters. Being inside her head and hearing her internal thoughts helped me feel connected to her. Hank and Aunt Alexandra were great, too, because they were vivid and well described.

Scout reacted much the same way I do when I encounter something that goes against my idea of equality. I get angry! I don’t understand why some people believe others are inherently better and why they’re not open to hearing a different opinion. I saw a lot of myself in Scout and I really liked reading about her reactions to her hometown. She grew up in that environment and it must have been startling to see how much it had changed because of national decisions.

Harper Lee Image via Biography

Harper Lee
Image via Biography

I liked the parts with Aunt Alexandra. She was a great female figure to have opposite Atticus. She had a great attitude and I liked how strong she was despite what had happened with her husband. The descriptions of her corset and her gossip with the local ladies had me smiling whenever she showed up in the narrative.

Listening to Uncle Jack and Atticus defend segregation was excruciating. The balance they were looking for in their lives being set into turmoil by human rights seemed like a dumb thing to complain about and seeing Scout come to accept that was hard. I can’t imagine the shock to her memories and her belief in her father to hear those things when she came home. It wasn’t what I wanted to hear from the book and I think it’s what gave it so much bad press. It’s too easy to think of Atticus in this book as the same lawyer in To Kill a Mockingbird and it makes it worse. I understand why so many readers were disappointed.

I was skeptical of Reese Whitherspoon as the narrator for this audiobook. I didn’t realize she was from New Orleans and would be able to do the voice and characters so well. I forgot it was her half the time I was listening. She brought a lot of her acting talent to the job and her inflection was incredible. I really recommend the audiobook.

Lee wanted to write a book about race and this sure fills that role. I strongly think that To Kill a Mockingbird did it so much better that they’re incomparable. Accepting the hatred and inability to cope with change she sees at home is not the ending I wanted as a reader. It’s not the ending Scout’s story deserved. It says something about race for sure, but not something I wanted to hear.

Writer’s Takeaway: Flashbacks! That was the editing need that stuck out the most to me. Flashbacks can serve a purpose but I felt a lot of Lee’s didn’t in this story. They made me love Scout and miss Jem, but didn’t develop the story. It’s a good reminder to use them sparingly if at all.

I enjoyed it more than I thought, but I wish I’d been able to go in with higher expectations. Four out of Five stars.

Until next time, write on.

You can follow me on GoodreadsFacebookTwitterPinterest, and Instagram. I’m available via email at SamAStevensWriter@gmail.com. And as always, feel free to leave a comment!

Related Posts:
Review: GO SET A WATCHMAN by Harper Lee | What’s Not Wrong
‘More than a little divisive’ – Go Set a Watchman by Harper Lee | Bookmunch
Book Review: Go Set a Watchman, by Harper Lee | The Booksellers New Zealand Blog
REVIEW: Go Set a Watchman by Harper Lee | Around the World in 80 Books

6 Responses to “Book Review: Go Set a Watchman by Harper Lee (4/5)”

  1. rainandcheese December 29, 2015 at 11:01 AM #

    I had mixed feelings reading the book because To Kill a Mockingbird was so perfect and this book just felt, well… incomplete. It was difficult for me to imagine that this was the sequel of TKM because of its cold narrative. Reading Scout and Atticus argue was painful to read and the ending made me gloomy the whole day.

    The flashbacks were what I enjoyed the most because that was the TKM I knew. I like that these children were breaking the norms and baffling adults, all done innocently but with grown-up Scout, I suppose it couldn’t be the same carefree days anymore. I agree that the flashbacks were unnecessary at times but I think I could read a book about Jem and Scout playing pretend all day and not get tired of it. 😀

    Agree with Aunt Alex and Uncle Jack. I’ve never saw them in this light before and this book gave me a better opinion of them.

    Great, great review! Most of the critiques of this book are downright negative and it was refreshing to read your side of things. Hope to hear more from you and happy reading!

    Like

    • Sam December 29, 2015 at 11:32 AM #

      I don’t think of it as a sequel to TKM for a lot of the reasons you say. It’s more of a companion novel if anything.
      A book of all flashbacks would have been incredible. So much fun and powerful. Glad you liked the review. Happy reading!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. authorswilliams December 29, 2015 at 12:32 PM #

    Great review. Actually I found this book to be all hyped up (maybe that’s just the particular groups I am a part of on Facebook.) Of course I would not expect an amazing book that is like written as a draft. Don’t hate me – but I could not get into To Kill a Mockingbird. Maybe i should try again, but I never read it before. Everyone swears its amazing (just the people I know? idk lol) So when you publish one fantastic book, it’s sometimes difficult to follow up. I’m glad you did this review

    Like

    • Sam December 29, 2015 at 1:09 PM #

      Thank you. It was a lot of hype and I understand why. After a book so many were required to read and many loved, anything that you write is going to disappoint. No shame in not liking a classic. There have been several I didn’t enjoy. Happy reading!

      Like

  3. P. C. Zick December 30, 2015 at 11:02 AM #

    I think going in with low expectations is a good idea. I also wrote a review of the book earlier this year, but I refused to read any other reviews first. I only knew of the hype and controversy. I loved the book and am grateful it came to light. I did not love the “quiet bigotry” as you put it, but that has nothing to do with the writing. It’s the way it was in the south (and unfortunately still is in some isolated parts). Thank you for your thoughtful review of a powerful book.

    Like

    • Sam December 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM #

      I’m glad you appreciate it. I’d heard to ‘Atticus is racist’ bits but didn’t read any reviews before going in either. Knowing the controversy was helpful before diving in because without that I would have expected more of the book. Thank you for your thoughtful comment. Happy reading!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.